MOON JAR, White porcelain, Joseon Dynasty (1392–1897 CE)
However, we may respond individually to certain customers after reviewing the circumstances.
Please contact us for further details.
Shipping to the United Kingdom and Switzerland remains available.
This item has been sold. If you are looking for a similar piece or another work from the same period, please feel free to contact us.
> Inquire about this or a similar itemThe Moon Jar, a distinguished masterpiece crafted during the mid-Joseon Dynasty, is also referred to as a lantern jar or full moon jar (Dalhanari). The Joseon period was profoundly influenced by Confucian ideals, which manifested in the arts through a restrained aesthetic that accentuated the purity of white porcelain. The hallmark of this era's white porcelain lies in its pristine whiteness, with subtle variations that are rarely identical, categorized into shades such as milky white, snow white, grayish white, and bluish white. The term "Moon Jar" was coined by the Korean abstract painter Kim Whanki, inspired by the jar's rounded form that resembles a full moon.
With its soft, flowing curves and robust body that cradles the essence of the full moon, the Moon Jar embodies a harmonious balance of grandeur and tranquility. Such forms were predominantly produced in the 17th century. The white of the Moon Jar is neither the pure white characteristic of early Joseon porcelain nor the grayish white typical of mid-Joseon ceramics, nor is it the bluish white commonly produced at the Bunwon kiln. While it is generally described as milky white, not all Moon Jars conform to this description; many exhibit a variety of white tones within a single vessel. Additionally, one may observe yellowish spots resulting from oxidation or incomplete combustion, as well as discoloration from liquid absorption in jars that were used as containers. The Moon Jar consistently displays a spectrum of white tones, subtly evolving over time.
This organic transformation of white, along with its tonal diversity, may be what captivates us. Furthermore, it is exceedingly rare to find large jars in the realm of global ceramics that are entirely devoid of decoration. The substantial white sphere of the Moon Jar serves as a blank canvas, stimulating our innate desire for simplicity. Once any form of painting or decoration is applied to its surface, the vessel ceases to be regarded as a Moon Jar. This blankness epitomizes a perfect expression of restraint and anonymity, devoid of desire or self-centeredness. The randomness it exudes possesses a compelling allure. The diverse thoughts and inspirations that arise from the Moon Jar's solemn yet delicate surface embody the aesthetic sensibilities and beauty appreciated by people of that time.
This piece forms a spherical shape worthy of the title "Moon Jar." There is one repair for water retention on the inside, and the foot exhibits a few knife marks and stains; however, I believe it is a fine example of this type of jar. Standing at 48 cm tall, it possesses a commanding presence. Although it is a large Moon Jar, it appears to have been crafted without connecting the top and bottom. Its alluring white hue is soft and captivating.
Its aesthetic placed emphasis not on surface splendor or technical virtuosity, but on forms and modes of being that quietly support a person’s inner life. Vessels and furniture were not simply tools for use; they may also have served as a kind of “place of self-cultivation,” ordering one’s daily conduct and state of mind. A plain jar in a scholar’s study, a simple desk, an undecorated brush rest—these were objects before the eye, but also mirrors of one’s posture and thought.
It is no accident that crafts from the Joseon period possess a presence that “does not say too much.” They were made to accompany the inner life—not to overwhelm the viewer, but to breathe alongside us and quietly restore a sense of order.
In white porcelain, for example, such “unintended phenomena” as the slight flow of glaze, variations in the clay body, or slight irregularities of form were accepted as they were. They embody a spirit of broad acceptance, unlike the modern aesthetic that treats perfection and uniformity as the highest values. This view reconsiders the boundaries between nature and human making, beauty and imperfection, object and mind; it is not an exaggeration to say that it existed beyond the frame of craft as the spirit of an age.
If we were to name it, the beauty of Joseon is not a “beauty of display” but a “beauty of resonance.” Its beauty lies not solely in the attraction of the object itself, but in the opportunity it gives us to reconsider how a person ought to be through the object. For this reason, an object must not speak too much; it must contain intervals, open space, and silence. I cannot help feeling that such thought runs beneath the making of these objects.
These values eventually crossed the sea and took deep root in Japan. In the world of chanoyu in particular, Joseon white porcelain and buncheong ware were already being used by the Momoyama period. Their simple, quiet character—different from the solemn grandeur of Chinese karamono—came to be embraced. The tea aesthetic of “clearing the mind before what does not speak” resonated deeply with the silence and imperfection held in Joseon vessels, nurturing a gaze that found in them the spirit of wabi-sabi.
With the arrival of the modern era, thinkers of the Mingei movement such as Yanagi Sōetsu and Kawai Kanjirō found in Joseon vessels “the power to purify a person” and “a form of life as it ought to be.” At a time when craft was being forgotten, these objects were welcomed not merely as old vessels but, with profound sympathy and respect, as presences reflecting a way of living itself.
When I, living in the present day, encounter the crafts of Joseon, I am moved once again by their stillness. They contain the thought of an age that asked how a person should live and how one should be. That thought has not faded; it continues to resonate clearly even now.
Choose options
Change language
